I5 4590 has 4 cores 4 threads, changing frequency to match is not going to make it the same. He was using my GTX 970 on his pc (16GB DDR4 + R5 3500 3.3GHz set to the same base frequency as my i5 4590 on purpose) instead and his fps was always above 200 which is ridiculous. I used my friend's 1660TI to test and the avg framerate was 165.5 FPS. You OP never provide what is your max resolution your computer can go to. (ultrawide) average 1440p performance FPS is 36.9 FPSĪnd it is for "GTX 970 with i5-4590 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality"
I5 4590 FOR 1080 VIDEO EDITING 1080P
In actual fact, your actual average 1080p performance FPS is 60.4 FPSĪverage 1440p performance FPS is 42.9 FPS That information you provide is for computers with resolution "Resolution 2560x1440" for CS:GO. Used MSI Afterburner to record benchmark information and I got thisĪctually, your information on your FPS for your CPU specs is totally wrong. CPU usage is around 70% and GPU usage is ~40%. Originally posted by MtLamlam:I use ultra settings at 1080P and the game can't even maintain 60+ fps all the time.
By the way, my memory is 8GB DDR3, though I don't think RAM makes much difference. I also found that the framerate dropped severely when there were more enemies. According to the site, the game should run at 143/159 1% low/avg fps with the same combination and settings. I know I can get more stable framerate if I use lower graphic settings, but I can't stand with my terrible performance compared to.
Used MSI Afterburner to record benchmark information and I got this I use ultra settings at 1080P and the game can't even maintain 60+ fps all the time.
0 kommentar(er)
